Book Review: Rivers of London by Ben Aaronovitch (US title: Midnight Riot)

Peter Grant is a thoroughly modern Copper. He loves beer, curries and football, he fancies his professional partner, has become cynical about being in uniform, has a love-hate relationship with the city of London and generally tries to get on in life while avoiding being pushed into a dull desk job. Yet when called to the scene of a bizarre murder, not to help with the investigation, but to stand guard so rubberneckers don’t spoil the crime scene he is quite surprised to be given a statement by a ghost who – despite being dead – is more than happy to be a good citizen in reporting what he had seen. This begins a voyage for Peter where he meets the last Wizard left in England who just happens to be a Police Inspector.

The world that opens for Peter is one where the mighty river Thames has a God and Goddess locked in a long-standing Cold War, where each of the tributary rivers have a minor deity of their own, where river nymphs, mermaids, vampires, werewolves and magic are not just common, but an integral part of the colourful city. Taken under the wing of Inspector Nightingale, Grant develops his magical powers much in a similar fashion to any other crime drama where the protege learns the ropes from the older, wiser senior officer.

Comparisons to Neverwhere are unfortunately inevitable. This is a shame, not because one is better than the other, but because of the different themes, subject matter and approach taken by the respective authors. Gaiman’s work in general leans slightly more toward traditional fantasy, a place where magic is real and the characters simply go with it. Even Richard Mayhew, snorting at London Below and the mythology of the city is compelled to take it all at face value. Peter Grant on the other hand is a Police Officer with a highly scientific mind and wants to know how and why magic works; in his spare time he tries to discover the attributes of magic, the limitations of his own powers and the effect that using magic has on the outside world. This is a novel where magic is woven into the background and carefully integrated to be plausible within the Laws of Physics.

Another way in which this is different from Neverwhere is that it is not about an alternate London that exists beneath the one we know (i.e. two cities that rarely meet), but one that is part of it. There are more adult themes here, sex, violence and the dangers of real Policing. There are also jokes that children simply will not get. The final way in which it differs is that this novel is primarily a crime drama whereas Neverwhere is more of a fantasy adventure. All the while Grant and Nightingale are trying to solve a series of bizarre murders and their relationship is very much like Holmes and Watson, Poirot and Hastings, Morse and Lewis.

Overall this is a wonderful book. Full of gags and tongue-in-cheek pop culture references, it is a thoroughly modern urban fantasy that pays quite deliberate homage to its contemporaries with in-jokes about Harry Potter and Twilight, not through the plot but through amusing references. You’ll chuckle at the jokes, you’ll marvel at the magic and you’ll be swept along in the mystery of the crime drama. There is something here for everyone. I’m already looking forward to the second in the series: Moon Over Soho.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Book Review: Rivers of London by Ben Aaronovitch (US title: Midnight Riot)

  1. I read and reviewed this last year and loved it too. I’ve interviewed the author, but that fell through at the last minute. Anyway, the second is far more adult than the first (sex! good sex, by the way), but I can’t say whether it if like Nevermore as I haven’t read it. Don’t tell me I have to put it on my to-read list…

    1. mgm75

      I remember you saying that and wondered what happened to the article.

      Neverwhere, if you don’t wany to read the book due to being snowed under already, started life as a TV series and the book came later. I highly recommend the 3hr BBC production. It stars the awesome Paterson Joseph.

      1. Oh, I did do the interview. I have it all ready to go, but just can’t get him to give me a final approval! (sigh) I think he has written me off. 😦

  2. This is a concise review. It gives enough material to the reader whether he/she would like to read the book or not yet it does not reveal the suspense of the story. Looking forward to more such reviews.

Have something to say? Go on, you know you want to:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s